Suction type or blow through maf?

Tech mumbo-jumbo... not Gizmodo.

Moderators: charlie, darkducati

User avatar
bradystrib
Man of Action
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:28 pm

Suction type or blow through maf?

Post by bradystrib »

Okay, so if you didnt know yet, I have a 240. I plan on building a KA-T. Already have some 550cc injectors, z32 maf, gt2871r (or stock sr t25),safc,blitz dd bov, some more stuffs......uhm so anyways yeah, I have heard different things as far which is better. I have heard about stalling issues and idle issues with a suction style. I also hear about exploding MAF's with the blow through. I don't plan on running more than 15-17 lbs with the 2871 on high boost and maybe 8-11 on low boost. Any thoughts???
JJ Alfano
Imitation Crab Meat
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Henry County

Post by JJ Alfano »

stock ecu or stand alone? if its stock with safc, i would just run suction since its easier

the bogging is from the a/f ratio going rich when the blow off valve releases
Image
User avatar
P.Haire
Trunk Junk
Posts: 14397
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: ZOO
Contact:

Post by P.Haire »

blow through is real deal race car stuff.
Image
please believe
User avatar
foilman
Not Really Past the Hazing
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:52 pm

Post by foilman »

Well, I've got a lot of experience there.
DO NOT RUN A STOCK SR TURBO ON YOUR KA. It's not even big enough for the SR it comes on and it will probably be worn out and tired when you get it anyway... but even if it's brand spankin' new, seriously, don't do it.

My FOERST turbo setup back in '02 was blow through and so were the 2 after that. I even tried the 3rd setup both ways at JWT's behest since they supplied the ECU, but after a few days was like, "no, fuck this, it works tons better my way". I never had a problem exploding the MAF, s14 or Z32. The response, stumbling, mileage, all better blow through. I have seen 1 MAF popped by boost, but he was running a lot. I was usually running 9-15 psi, 18 for a little.
User avatar
bradystrib
Man of Action
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:28 pm

Post by bradystrib »

foilman wrote:Well, I've got a lot of experience there.
DO NOT RUN A STOCK SR TURBO ON YOUR KA. It's not even big enough for the SR it comes on and it will probably be worn out and tired when you get it anyway... but even if it's brand spankin' new, seriously, don't do it.

My FOERST turbo setup back in '02 was blow through and so were the 2 after that. I even tried the 3rd setup both ways at JWT's behest since they supplied the ECU, but after a few days was like, "no, fuck this, it works tons better my way". I never had a problem exploding the MAF, s14 or Z32. The response, stumbling, mileage, all better blow through. I have seen 1 MAF popped by boost, but he was running a lot. I was usually running 9-15 psi, 18 for a little.
well, good deal then. The 2871r it is. And i think i am leaning more towards the blow through set up. Thanks a ton for the info mr. shorts.
User avatar
P.Haire
Trunk Junk
Posts: 14397
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: ZOO
Contact:

Post by P.Haire »

go bigger.
t3/t4!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Image
please believe
User avatar
bradystrib
Man of Action
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:28 pm

Post by bradystrib »

P.Haire wrote:go bigger.
t3/t4!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I've thought about it....arg. I dunno, i like the simplicity of bottom mount stuff....but top mount is ballin...
User avatar
ChadMK4
Purple Drank
Posts: 2385
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:23 am
Location: Stocking Wood
Contact:

Post by ChadMK4 »

Then whats the safe psi range for blow through? I've been thinking of this too but I was told that the chance of popping to MAF is to great. I'm gonna be running the 20g. I don't know what amount of boost yet. I would assume 14+. But I know that the bigger the turbo the less boost needed to make more power. I"m assuming because of the volume of air being forced is greater with a bigger turbo.
But that has always confused me too. Because in the end, when it reaches the plenum it's still 14 lbs...? 14 lbs is still 14 lbs right? Anyone got a conclusion to my confusion?
Image
User avatar
POOPscandal
Taco Bar Extraordinaire
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 12:59 am
Location: !black emperor

Post by POOPscandal »

its cause pressure =/= volume or something to that effect.
Superb Tough Highest Performer Driven to Lifestyles Unimaginable
Image
:domo: :domo: :domo:PHOTOBLARG! :domo: :domo: :domo:NEW EXCITING BLARG! :domo: :domo: :domo:
"thanks man, I didn't do it, but I'm a fan of apple penis" - <3 internet
User avatar
ChadMK4
Purple Drank
Posts: 2385
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:23 am
Location: Stocking Wood
Contact:

Post by ChadMK4 »

Uum............. What?

I'm not an equation kinda guy. :-*
Image
User avatar
andysapp
I need to go outside
Posts: 28833
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: KILL 'EM ALL.

Post by andysapp »

That's right. He's a happy meal and a Blockbuster kind of guy.
Cheap date = FUN date.
User avatar
kOOpA
Rock Smoke
Posts: 3770
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:47 am

Post by kOOpA »

ChadMK4 wrote:What?
the amount of pressure the air is under is not equal to the volume of air going into the motor. saying you're running 20lbs of boost is not saying how much air is entering the motor, it's just saying how dense the air particles will be.

air particles entering the motor = air particle density * air volume
Image
User avatar
ChadMK4
Purple Drank
Posts: 2385
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:23 am
Location: Stocking Wood
Contact:

Post by ChadMK4 »

So it's not based on pressure?
Image
User avatar
andysapp
I need to go outside
Posts: 28833
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: KILL 'EM ALL.

Post by andysapp »

Image
User avatar
ChadMK4
Purple Drank
Posts: 2385
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:23 am
Location: Stocking Wood
Contact:

Post by ChadMK4 »

andysapp wrote:Image
ok its settled.. ^^next years Halloween costume!!
Image
Post Reply