Re: Triple Threat II - Round 3 Pics (Pics on Pg. 2)
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:29 pm
Inappropriate Chris wrote:We need our Cody and Panderz back for picture taking, hurry up with all your crap Cody!!!
This.. the pro's kno.
http://driftmechaniks.com/forum/
Inappropriate Chris wrote:We need our Cody and Panderz back for picture taking, hurry up with all your crap Cody!!!
Pff, that's nothing.shawn shawn wrote:Patrick approves!marlow<12 wrote:low shutter speed is manly way to shoot
and i still rock out my d40 yo
^see that photo! Don't get jealous of my talent. I used some random shutter speed, med light, and 3 whole megapixels. Take notes.

Sorry to break it to you but that pic sucks. Way too clear.FooSchnickens wrote:Pff, that's nothing.shawn shawn wrote:Patrick approves!marlow<12 wrote:low shutter speed is manly way to shoot
and i still rock out my d40 yo
^see that photo! Don't get jealous of my talent. I used some random shutter speed, med light, and 3 whole megapixels. Take notes.
Lunch break, nukka. Even let the phone figure out the B&W.
Sorry to break it to you but brick walls aren't terribly full of actshuns. Unless there's a monster truck barreling through it, but we don't get many of those rumbling through mayretta.shawn shawn wrote:Sorry to break it to you but that pic sucks. Way too clear.FooSchnickens wrote:Pff, that's nothing.shawn shawn wrote:Patrick approves!marlow<12 wrote:low shutter speed is manly way to shoot
and i still rock out my d40 yo
^see that photo! Don't get jealous of my talent. I used some random shutter speed, med light, and 3 whole megapixels. Take notes.
Lunch break, nukka. Even let the phone figure out the B&W.
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF- ok you win. I can't compete with that.shawn shawn wrote:Well my pic has a toyota mini van in it.

I like 1/160thcollink wrote:Poor photographer doesn't mean poor camera...LMAO. I'll get better. I just shot what I wanted. I like it when the action is just frozen. But next event I'll have to try a lower shutter speed and get some motion blur.FooSchnickens wrote:Told ya you wouldn't like the D40
Any suggestions?

Go fuck yourself, k? No I'm not serious.matts13 wrote:jsquared wrote:The best part is, he blew the tire then took another run right after riding on the rim. Srsly.
how is this good. by abusing the lot we get to drift on and tearing it up is good and cool??? no that is how we get asked not to come back.
I like this post. ^^POOPscandal wrote:i've been drawing whales.
You start at 1/60-1/120 depending on the speeds of the cars, and their wheel speeds, and work from there. That preserves the slight blur in the wheels to convey the action of movement. You shot a majority of these shots around 1/400. EXIF never lies. Secondly, White Balance = auto, come on! You're outside with moving cars, you don't shoot auto WB if you want decent color off the bat. If you want to batch process hundreds of pictures later, be my guest. Why make it harder than it needs to be? Thirdly, why would you use spot metering if you aren't framing the cars tight enough that the background has a reserved space in the frame (hence why it's blown out on occasion) & F/stops that aren't shallow (no bokeh)? Center weighted. Check it.collink wrote:You want I shoulda shot a slower shutter speed and got some motion blur?POOPscandal wrote:color looks bad and the cars look hard parked with some smoke around them.
charming picture of rhoad though.