Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:22 pm
Frosty_SPL wrote: Maybe the hogans will bitch at nopi for the courses being so dangerous, maybe nopi will listen.
The courses are not dangerous
Frosty_SPL wrote: Maybe the hogans will bitch at nopi for the courses being so dangerous, maybe nopi will listen.
Isn't speed part of the judging? Just throwing that out there.Tracy wrote:The Mopar guy was going WAY too fast all day, IMO.
Im still so mad i wasnt able to drive on that course!!andysapp wrote:STL was SOO much fun! That track was killer.
Theres a big difference between a fast entry, and just going way too fast.Midtenn wrote:Isn't speed part of the judging? Just throwing that out there.Tracy wrote:The Mopar guy was going WAY too fast all day, IMO.
Dude, Denver was WIIDDDDEEEE. People wrecked beacuse of driver error, not course design. LA was more of a commitment track, but still safe. Both courses you really had to mess up to end up in the wall.CodyW wrote:i'll agree that the last 2 tracks were just a bit narrow in my opinion. i think the fact that probably 8-10 cars hit/wrecked at the last 2 events says a little something too. all i want is for more STL style courses, that one was lots of fun, perfect for exiting tandem, and pretty safe.
Yes it is, but in the driver's meeting it was stated that the wall along the initiation was not judged. So you did not have to be right on it. Chris was initiating at the bottom of the hill all weekend. He just got too close that time.Midtenn wrote:Isn't speed part of the judging? Just throwing that out there.Tracy wrote:The Mopar guy was going WAY too fast all day, IMO.